il film

watch my films here

Monday, January 19, 2009

Cinema Paradiso & Classic Hollywood Cinema

One of the things that struck me the most about David Bordwell’s Classic Hollywood Cinema was the definition of the “Hollywood formula” for screenplays. Bordwell writes: “the plot consists of an undisturbed stage, the disturbance, the struggle, and the elimination of the disturbance.” In this day and age of cinema, it is incredible to see how much screenplays have advanced and changed, and how films bend these once rigid rules. Screenplay writing, like every active medium, is incredibly adaptable. People get bored with the wooden, formulaic screenplays and ask for more challenging narratives. The movies today (as exemplified by Fight Club and Amelie) are clear and set examples of rule-defying narratives. However, a screenplay can be challenging and classic at the same time. Cinema Paradiso is just that. It immediately defies the traditional outline for the Hollywood screenplay (it spends essentially no time exploring the “undisturbed stage” of our protagonist and jumps immediately into the disturbance, requiring a change both in time and setting). Salvatore, our protagonist, comes home to the news that his old friend Alfredo has died. Salvatore has not been home in thirty years, but his mother, who called with the news, is sure that he will return for the funeral. In order to establish the narrative, the film must jump backwards to Salvatore’s childhood. The disturbance is clear: Salvatore’s mother calls and her news brings Salvatore back to his hometown and forces him to remember all that his childhood meant to him. But what exactly is Salvatore’s struggle? Is it a simple return home, to make things right with his mother and to honor his past with Alfredo? Is it to reconnect with his childhood love, Elena? Perhaps it is larger than that, more of an identity struggle he must endure. Is Salvatore being forced to mesh together the identity he created as a child (which, as the spectator finds outs, mainly deals with his obsession with films, especially the racier clips that are cut out), with his current, successful and professional one? It is most likely a combination of the three, with emphasis on the third definition. Cinema Paradiso plays with the effects of film on identity. It follows a film-obsessed child and how the romance of the cinema, the community togetherness of the theater, shaped and created his identity. Toto (Salvatore’s name when he was younger) lives his life as it was a film. His romance with Elena is most strongly expressed when Salvatore, as a young teenager, films her with his camera and, later on, when he dramatically embraces her in the rain. Both are cinematic moments, and the young Salvatore frames them in terms of cinema and film, rather than in more personal terms. But is the disturbance finally eliminated at the end of the film? The final sequence, the montage of the racy clips that Alfredo compiled and put together in a film reel for Salvatore, truly brings everything together. It is a compilation of what drove Toto into the film world as a child. It is brought together in a single reel, and also is evidence that Alfredo, even though he told Salvatore never to return to his hometown, knew that Salvatore would do just that. He would return home, he would honor his childhood and his infatuation with the cinema, he would wrap together his identities into one.

5 comments:

  1. I believe that when you say, “Toto…lives his life as if it were a film” is not only completely accurate, but also a driving factor for the issues he faces throughout his childhood and later on in life. The prime example you give, his relationship with Elana, is completely over-the-top and saturated in the ideals of Hollywood romance. His identity is so buried because he does not view cinema as most others do, as an escape. Instead, he sees it as an ideal, as what his life should be modeled after. This is one of the problems in Cinema Paradiso, and the reason that Toto continues to struggle with his own sense of identity

    ReplyDelete
  2. When you referenced the "life as if it were a film" quote, I got to to thinking. I believe we (humans) all live our lives (to a certain extent) as if it was a film. Due to the mass infiltration of cinema in our lives, we see who we are and who we want to be in the characters and the scenes on the big screen. How girls picture themselves while walking down the sidewalk to be Carrie Bradshaw from Sex and the City. How we all think that our first kiss are going to be this cliche' firework-filled moment with a full orchestra playing in the background (similar to Toto's embrace with Elena in the rain - how many times have we all dreamed of that one?) . We both know that life is not like that, but film teaches us a language that transcends our thoughts and our senses. And with each passing movie that we see that capture our hearts, we grab a part of our favorite characters and scenes and infused them into our own identity.

    ReplyDelete
  3. In your post you discuss the true "disturbance" of the film. If, like you said the disturbance is largely the need for Salvatore to reconcile his dual identities as an idealistic lover of film and as a successful producer, then I believe the film leaves his predicament largely unresolved. It seems like instead of reconciling his identities, he has completely abandoned his past, as he was instructed by Alfredo. This can be understood in the scene of Alfredo’s funeral, when a man who is much older than he is calls him Sir. Salvatore tells him to call him Toto, but the man replies that “things are different, you are a big shot now.” I think the movie is specifically told by way of a flashback to show that Salvatore can only reflect on his memories of the past- that they are no longer a part of him at all. He has given that up for something else.

    ReplyDelete
  4. To understand Toto, you have to fully understand Alfredo's role. His influence over Toto was paramount, and after 30 years, only his death brought Toto back home. He was Toto's gift. In fact, he was a gift to the entire community. Yet, he was also a curse. He kept the community stagnant, given that movie watching was their only outlet. There were grave problems, but the outlet of movies allowed the people of Giancaldo to forget these problems. Alfredo recognized his influence, and didn't want Toto to stay. To me, the disturbance was between remembering your past (both good and bad) and moving past it. Alfredo symbolized both of these in Toto's life, and his death brought things full circle.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for this post Charles. Your reading of the film is compelling. It would be more compelling with more specific descriptions of the "cinematic moments" you discuss. I look forward to continuing to read your writing.
    Best,
    Alexis

    ReplyDelete